<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>APLEblog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apleblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apleblog.com</link>
	<description>American Politics Law and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sandy, Hillary and cliff – can the GOP regroup?</title>
		<link>http://apleblog.com/2013/01/07/sandy-hillary-and-cliff-%e2%80%93-can-the-gop-regroup/</link>
		<comments>http://apleblog.com/2013/01/07/sandy-hillary-and-cliff-%e2%80%93-can-the-gop-regroup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton's concussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apleblog.com/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of showing strength, the proposal exposed the weakness of Boehner as the leader of his Party.  Can the Republican Party regroup and do what is necessary to win in 2016?  Only time will tell.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://apleblog.com/2013/01/07/sandy-hillary-and-cliff-%e2%80%93-can-the-gop-regroup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was 2012 the pinnacle of proof a double standard exists for Blacks</title>
		<link>http://apleblog.com/2012/12/31/was-2012-the-pinnacle-of-proof-a-double-standard-exists-for-blacks/</link>
		<comments>http://apleblog.com/2012/12/31/was-2012-the-pinnacle-of-proof-a-double-standard-exists-for-blacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keiron Jackman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double standard apleblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double standard for blacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keiron Jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[was 2012 proof a double standard exists for blacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apleblog.com/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often we find ourselves discussing some true event in which a person, a white person, accomplishes something extraordinary, good or bad, and the discussion concludes with the statement “if that [person] was a black man” it would be different. We say this when whites get away with “murder,” when discussing rags to riches stories, and even when debating politics. Without taking away from the individual effort needed to accomplish anything extraordinary, 2012 has revealed answers to many of these debates, if not all in principle.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://apleblog.com/2012/12/31/was-2012-the-pinnacle-of-proof-a-double-standard-exists-for-blacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Convict George Zimmerman 101: Part II, The Prologue</title>
		<link>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/09/how-to-convict-george-zimmerman-101-part-ii-the-prologue/</link>
		<comments>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/09/how-to-convict-george-zimmerman-101-part-ii-the-prologue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keiron Jackman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Corey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apleblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convict zimmerman Part II The Prologue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to convict george zimmerman Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to convict zimmerman Part 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keiron Jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark O'Mara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stand your ground florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Prologue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trayvon martin case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimmerman guilty or innocent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apleblog.com/?p=1553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scene is set: George Zimmerman and Mark O’Mara are sitting at the defense table intently looking at lead prosecutor Angela Corey as she approaches the podium, acknowledges the court, looks at the defense table, acknowledges their presence, paces a few steps from the podium and finally turns to the jury and just before her lips part to say the first word, Mark O’Mara holds his breath. Angela Corey has two choices: she can present to the jury that Zimmerman was engaged in a wrongful act just as he encountered Trayvon Martin or she can show that George Zimmerman was the first aggressor. These two choices have different implications and although she can argue both, the evidence she will use to convey either theory to the jury would essentially be the same, rather, it will the only other side to the story. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/09/how-to-convict-george-zimmerman-101-part-ii-the-prologue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Lauryn Hill, change comes eventually</title>
		<link>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/07/for-lauryn-hill-change-comes-eventually/</link>
		<comments>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/07/for-lauryn-hill-change-comes-eventually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauryn Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauryn Hill sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauryn Hill tax evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apleblog.com/?p=1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the decision to plead guilty instead of going to trial, thus saving the government money and precious resources may very well have been the best legal strategy in this case. A sentence which does not include jail time may be appropriate if this strategy is utilized.  
  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://apleblog.com/2012/09/07/for-lauryn-hill-change-comes-eventually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
